&& 查看话题
请虫友们推荐好发的正规的教改论文期刊
最近写了一篇教改论文，涉及到教改项目结题，着急发表，麻烦各位虫友推荐一个比较好发的正规杂志，最好版面费别太贵，最好是10天之内就给消息的，1天就给消息才好呢，呵呵，请虫友推荐！谢谢
西南大学的 物理教学讨论 中国电力教育、辽宁行政学院学报 我不发教改文章的,不知道,呵呵 化学及化工相关的教改论文，可在《广州化工》发表，发表速度能满足楼主要求。 广州有几个刊物都挺好的，时间短，文章页可以！ 平时不烧香，监时抱佛脚！ 《广州化工》挺不错的，我投了两篇，效率高也实惠，有需要的话可以上网搜他们的官网。 顶一下，作为对楼主的感谢
哈哈 上海交大的实验室研究与探索，清华的实验技术与管理 楼上有人提到《中国电力教育》，这个我投过，半月刊，很快给结果，也就三五天顶多了，试试吧！ 广州化工期刊，发表快！:hand: : Originally posted by wangjiu2012 at
广州化工期刊，发表快！:hand: 你好，请问版面费是多少？
var cpro_id = 'u1216994';
欢迎监督和反馈：本帖内容由
提供，小木虫仅提供交流平台，不对该内容负责。欢迎协助我们监督管理，共同维护互联网健康，如果您对该内容有异议，请立即发邮件到
联系通知管理员，也可以通过QQ周知，我们的QQ号为：8835100
我们保证在1个工作日内给予处理和答复，谢谢您的监督。
小木虫，学术科研第一站，为中国学术科研研究提供免费动力
广告投放请联系QQ： &
违规贴举报删除请联系邮箱： 或者 QQ:8835100
Copyright &
eMuch.net, All Rights Reserved. 小木虫 版权所有&& 查看话题
大修审稿意见，重金求教如何回复
投稿Energy，35天后返回修改，给的大修，求教有经验的虫友如何回复审稿意见比较好。另外，为什么附件里只有一个人的审稿人意见？
The review of this paper is now complete, and I am including the Reviewers' reports (directly at the end of this email and sometimes as attachments).&&As you can see, one Reviewer recommends rejection, and the others recommend possible reconsideration after major revisions.&&If you are able to revise the manuscript thoroughly in response to the Reviewers' comments, I believe that it would be suitable for second review.&&I should add that, in view of the strong criticisms, anything but a thorough response and revision would just be an unfortunate waste of time.
Once you have revised the paper accordingly, please submit with it a note describing in detail your response to these comments and a separate copy of the revised paper marked up to indicate where the revisions were made.
NOTE: Upon submitting your revised manuscript, please upload the source files for your article. For additional details regarding acceptable file formats, please refer to the Guide for Authors at: /journals/energy//guide-for-authors
When submitting your revised paper, we ask that you include the following items:
Manuscript and Figure Source Files (mandatory)
We cannot accommodate PDF manuscript files for production purposes. We also ask that when submitting your revision you follow the journal formatting guidelines.&&Figures and tables may be embedded within the source file for the submission as long as they are of sufficient resolution for Production. Refer to the Guide for Authors for additional information.
/journals/energy//guide-for-authors
Highlights (mandatory)
Highlights consist of a short collection of bullet points that convey the core findings of the article and should be submitted in a separate file in the online submission system. Please use 'Highlights' in the file name and include 3 to 5 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including spaces, per bullet point). See the following website for more information
/highlights
Please note that this journal offers a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown next to published articles on ScienceDirect (see also /audioslides). If your paper is accepted for publication, you will automatically receive an invitation to create an AudioSlides presentation.
Thank you for your interest in ENERGY.
Sincerely,
Milorad Lj Bojic, Ph.D.
Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer #1: Through a thorough reading and reviewing, the reviewer suggests that the following problems should be addressed and the manuscript should be modified.
1. Keywords should contain &Lauric acid&.&&
2.&&XRD results reveal that the IKL and LA/IKL have the same diffraction peak at 2&theta& of 7.8o, indicating that the LA molecules are mainly located on the IKL surface rather than the inner-layer. Please discuss in more detail.
3. In the FTIR spectra, there are no peaks at 3670 and 3624 cm-1, please check why?
4. The authors note that the LA drives the IKL to exfoliate, which may afford an increase of specific surface area for LA/IKL. However, BET results reveal an obvious reduction of specific surface area. Is there any other reason for this reduction, for example the LA/IKL aggregation? Since SEM images imply that LA/IKL has larger size than IKL.
5. Please check the result of the impregnation ratio of LA in LA/IKL (51.5 wt%), which should be about 58 wt%.
Reviewer #2: This manuscript reported a novel form-stable phase change material (FSPCM) for thermal energy storage which was prepared by*******. I have read the whole paper and find that this study is simple and less novelty. The very similar work been published in Journal of Materials Science & Engineering (Preparation and Thermal Properties of Binary Organic / kaolin Composites as Shape-stabilized Phase Change Material for Thermal Energy Storage, 8-272.) In addition, the Ref. 19 and Ref. 29 have been cited repeatedly. Therefore, this paper in present stage could not be accepted for publication in Energy.
Reviewer #3: COMMENTS:
(1) The authors need to be careful in their English usage. Therefore, full of the paper should be reviewed. Especially, some sentences in the introduction section are lack of continuity.
(2) What is LOI in Table 1? Please clearly write it.
(3) On page 4, line 7, &The suspension was ultrasonic at 70 oC for 2 h….& should be corrected as &The suspension was kept in ultrasonic bath at 70 oC for 2 h….&
(4) The performances of energy storage and release of composite PCMs are substantially dependent on their thermal conductivity. Therefore, the thermal conductivity of the composite PCM is important parameter in thermal energy storage applications.&&Please clarify the why did the authors measure the thermal conductivity value of the composite PCM. I the authors should be provided the thermal conductivity value of the composite PCM.
(5) There are some writing errors in the text. F
---On page 1, line 24, &kaolinite is one ….. & should be &Kaolinite is one …..&
---On page 1, line 59, &In recently years, …..& should be corrected as &In recent years , ….&
---On page 5, line 1, &Differential scanning calorimety (DSC) was carried out…..& should be
& & corrected as &Differential scanning calorimety (DSC) measurements were carried out….&
---On page 5, line 15, &The morphology and microstructure was…..& should be corrected as &The morphology and microstructure were…..&
---On page 6, line 58, &FTIR spectroscopy and the results is shown…..& should be corrected as &FTIR spectroscopy and the results are shown ..&
---On page 7, line 19, &The adsorption peaks at 2923 cm-1 and 2854 cm-1 is caused…..& should be corrected as &The adsorption peaks at 2923 cm-1 and 2854 cm-1 are caused..&
---On page 8, line 19, &…… of mespores below …...& should be corrected as &…… of mesopores below …….&
---On page 8, line 47, &……SEM images were made.& should be &…SEM images were obtained.
---On page 9, in the caption of section 3.5 &thermal properties…...& should be corrected as &Thermal properties……&
(4) The following papers can be useful to more clearly understanding the form-stable composite PCM:
---Capric-myristic acid/expanded perlite composite as form-stable phase change material for latent heat thermal energy storage, Renewable Energy&&Volume: 33& &Issue: 12& &DEC 2008 Pages: & &
---Preparation, characterization and thermal properties of Lauryl alcohol/Kaolin as novel form-stable composite phase change material for thermal energy storage in buildings, Applied Thermal Engineering, Volume 59, Issues 1-2, 25 September 2013, Pages 336-347
---Structures and thermal properties of fatty acid/expanded perlite composites as form-stable phase change materials Energy and Buildings, Volume 68, Part A, January 2014, Pages 587-592
---Preparation, characterization and thermal properties of lauric acid/expanded perlite as novel form-stable composite phase change material, Chemical Engineering Journal&&Volume: 155& &Issue: 3& &Pages: 899-904& &Published: DEC 15 2009
---Preparation, thermal properties and thermal reliability of eutectic mixtures of fatty acids/expanded vermiculite as novel form-stable composites for energy storage Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry&&Volume: 16& &Issue: 5& &Pages: 767-773& &Published: SEP 25 2010
很认真的看完了，只是我帮不到你，也许马上我也要面临了，同求有经验的大神们指点。还有楼主当时投稿是不是有点着急了， 你按审稿人的建议认认真真地修改，特别是第二个审稿人，说你的论文simple and less novelty，这是很大的硬伤，这个问题不解决，很难录用的。还有你们细节太不注意了，英语写作也要提高。 明明三个审稿人意见，为啥说只有一个？第二个审稿人的意见要认真对待，需要说明你的工作和那个已发表的文章的不同点或创新点在哪里。祝好运 第二个是硬伤，其它的按照审稿人的意见改~~好好想想怎么回答第二个审稿人的意见吧~:hand::hand: 好好根据审稿意见修改文章，特别是意见不好的那位。每一天都要回复，并说明文章是怎么带的，或者对审稿意见进行解释。
祝福楼主好运！
也为自己文章祈福！
祝福与祈祷中... 有的审稿人直接加附件, 有的直接填写在文字编辑框中 恭喜啊& &同样需要学习 blessing, blessing:arm::arm:祝福 大修就有很大的机会，一定要尽你所能的修改，加油
var cpro_id = 'u1216994';
欢迎监督和反馈：本帖内容由
提供，小木虫仅提供交流平台，不对该内容负责。欢迎协助我们监督管理，共同维护互联网健康，如果您对该内容有异议，请立即发邮件到
联系通知管理员，也可以通过QQ周知，我们的QQ号为：8835100
我们保证在1个工作日内给予处理和答复，谢谢您的监督。
小木虫，学术科研第一站，为中国学术科研研究提供免费动力
广告投放请联系QQ： &
违规贴举报删除请联系邮箱： 或者 QQ:8835100
Copyright &
eMuch.net, All Rights Reserved. 小木虫 版权所有&& 查看话题
Applied Energy投稿
6月份投的AE，一直Witheditor，两周前刚收到：Your submission &。。。& will be handled by Associate Editor Anthony Paul Roskilly, PhD.请问大家有遇到这样的问题么，这个状态已经两周了，能不能催？现在这个期刊审稿怎么这么慢啊
Your submission &。。。& will be handled by Associate Editor Anthony Paul Roskilly, PhD
这个标明已经分配编辑了，这个编辑为你找审稿人，审稿人意见都回来了，他决定是否录用
投稿之前应该看看最新发表的文章都是什么周期 : Originally posted by hxgu at
Your submission &。。。& will be handled by Associate Editor Anthony Paul Roskilly, PhD
这个标明已经分配编辑了，这个编辑为你找审稿人，审稿人意见都回来了，他决定是否录用
投稿之前应该看 ... 我看小木虫上说这个期刊快才投的，呜呜 : Originally posted by yaoking at
我看小木虫上说这个期刊快才投的，呜呜... 可能审稿快也没准 看看你的稿件编号（今年第一篇的编号是00001），就知道编辑们的工作量有多大了 : Originally posted by nono2009 at
看看你的稿件编号（今年第一篇的编号是00001），就知道编辑们的工作量有多大了 我晕，这么多，太恐怖了 先等等吧，我的投AE一审三个月才回来，两个月的时候催过一次，中间witheditor的日期换了三次，可能是换审稿人什么的，感觉这个就是很慢的样子，每隔两三周witheditor的状态时间更新一次，祝你好运 : Originally posted by 钰菡 at
先等等吧，我的投AE一审三个月才回来，两个月的时候催过一次，中间witheditor的日期换了三次，可能是换审稿人什么的，感觉这个就是很慢的样子，每隔两三周witheditor的状态时间更新一次，祝你好运 已经有消息了，两个意见，都是拒稿，唉
var cpro_id = 'u1216994';
欢迎监督和反馈：本帖内容由
提供，小木虫仅提供交流平台，不对该内容负责。欢迎协助我们监督管理，共同维护互联网健康，如果您对该内容有异议，请立即发邮件到
联系通知管理员，也可以通过QQ周知，我们的QQ号为：8835100
我们保证在1个工作日内给予处理和答复，谢谢您的监督。
小木虫，学术科研第一站，为中国学术科研研究提供免费动力
广告投放请联系QQ： &
违规贴举报删除请联系邮箱： 或者 QQ:8835100
Copyright &
eMuch.net, All Rights Reserved. 小木虫 版权所有&& 查看话题
外审意见回来了，应该是major revise。想让大家看看，有多大机会录用
外审意见回来了，应该是大修。想让大家看看，有多大机会
主编意见：On the basis of these reviews and my own reading, I am sorry to conclude that the manuscript is not in a shape in which it can be published in xxxxxxxxx. Yet, if you feel that you can address my points and the reviewers' points in a satisfying way,I encourage you to revise your manuscript.
If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.
Reviewer #1: Overall, the text would benefit greatly from a revision by a native English speaker as there are still many grammatical problems with the manuscript, which make it difficult to follow. In particular, please change all sentences with the structure 'no any ?&&to 'no' only. Please use past tense throughout and check your prepositions.
Although the findings are important and interesting the manuscript still needs work to improve clarity and language.
Reviewer #2:The authors addressed an important issue using an interesting design. The results are new and interesting. However, at the moment the paper has several shortcomings that need to be revised (see comments). One important weakness of the paper is the language. The introduction and discussion need further revision in order to improve the readability of the paper. Additionally, the rationale of Experiment 1 needs to be elaborated (see comment). In summary, although design and results are interesting the MS needs a substantial revision before publication.
主要说的是语言的问题呀，正面评价有。
我觉得好好修改机会很大。
刚刚修改完一篇，几乎相当于重新写了一遍。
很煎熬，有几天通宵。
祝楼主好运。 英语表达不行啊！花钱请润色公司彻底润色下吧 这个你的仔细修改,不着急提交
一定亲自修改好了,让别人也看舒服了,才提交
对以后也有帮助
开始写英语文章总是有点困难的,慢慢的习惯就好了 多看看相似内容的文献&&把句子斟酌几遍&&应该问题不大 有希望啊！ 这种情况，好好修改，投回去。没有选择，不是内容问题，语言问题太大，投别的也一样（可能还不给你机会）。 按照要求好好修改了的话，应该没有什么问题。恭喜！ 改完了问题不大 很有戏的 语言问题而已 这不是硬伤 对啊，正面评价非常多，好好改语言吧，不过因为语言的问题，审稿的没仔细看，要有二次修改的思想准备，。 都很正面啊，主要就是个语言问题，真的得找英语是母语的人帮忙修改，感觉会不一样的，自己多用点心，正如楼上几位说的，多熬几个通宵，呵呵，相信楼主的文章一定能被接受！ Originally posted by kongfeng87 at
外审意见回来了，应该是大修。想让大家看看，有多大机会
主编意见：On the basis of these reviews and my own reading, I am sorry to conclude that the manuscript is not in a shape in which it can be pub ... 如果你愿意，可发来，对你可能有帮助。
还是有机会的 very positive comments. congratulations in advance.:D 主要是语法上的问题，好好修改，很有戏，楼主可能是刚开始写英文文章，多写几篇就好了，其实英文的文章比中文的好写，而且国外的审稿人很客观，发稿周期还短，最好的是不用花钱，期待你的好消息！ 主要问题是语言。文章本身（从研究设计到结果）都很好。要下一番功夫，重新翻译。 应该能中，加油
var cpro_id = 'u1216994';
欢迎监督和反馈：本帖内容由
提供，小木虫仅提供交流平台，不对该内容负责。欢迎协助我们监督管理，共同维护互联网健康，如果您对该内容有异议，请立即发邮件到
联系通知管理员，也可以通过QQ周知，我们的QQ号为：8835100
我们保证在1个工作日内给予处理和答复，谢谢您的监督。
小木虫，学术科研第一站，为中国学术科研研究提供免费动力
广告投放请联系QQ： &
违规贴举报删除请联系邮箱： 或者 QQ:8835100
Copyright &
eMuch.net, All Rights Reserved. 小木虫 版权所有}